Ⅵ Seeing the Relativity of Principles from Time Bomb Paradox
来源:COLLECTIONS OF TAIJI EVOLUTIONISM | 作者:YONG DUAN | 发布时间: 2021-11-05 | 8204 次浏览 | 分享到:

 rely on continuous trial and should have courage to face reality, choices, failure, and rebellion of future generations.

In 2014, the nature of Taiwan's Wang Jinping's law case was illegal and corrupt. Ma Yingjiu thinks that upholding the rule of law is an immutable principle, it is a matter of major issues. However, he did not think that the principle of the major issue can also be overturned. Being a president playing all his cards, not only did he not win the law, but he did not win the popular vote.

The principle of anti-corruption is not yet the biggest principle, and denying such principles can be understood. The principle of peace and democracy can also be denied. War is often the only way to overthrow the reactionary regime. Many countries in the world still haven't democracy now. Can the principle of patriotism be negated? Is it possible to sell the country? The answer is also possible. This answer is unacceptable to today's angry young men who are indignant at the revival of Japanese militarism. It is also absolutely impossible for the millions spirit of martyrs in the Anti-Japanese War to accept. However, please think about it. The Qing dynasty has been maintained in China for more than 260 years, and the 400 million Han nationality people have been condemned as slaves. At the beginning of fierce resistance, most Chinese people did not want to bow to the Qing Dynasty. They believed that “patriotism” is the most basic belief in life. To surrender to a foreign tribe is to betray the ancestors, it is not good enough to be human. However, the resistance soon ceased. The rulers of Qing dynasty practiced many enlightened rules. Most people no longer have righteous indignation, words and deeds of traitors are accepted, and the principle of patriotism is abandoned. The surrender of small countries around to China is also betrayal for them, but Chinese people have never doubted the justness of it, let alone Tibet, Xinjiang, and Taiwan.

Of course, the principle of patriotism is correct in most cases, and it must be followed. I only emphasized that it is not the most fundamental value standard.